The Code Development Process

Imagine a world where you can shape the regulations that ensure the health, safety and welfare of the people who live in, work in and visit the community you serve. You don't have to.

The International Code Council develops construction and public safety codes through a governmental consensus process. This system of code development has provided the highest level of safety in the world for more than 90 years.

The Code Council governmental consensus process meets the principles defined by the National Standards Strategy of 2000, and the OMB Circular A-119, Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities (1998). It complies with Public Law 104-113 National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995.

Click below to download our brochure to learn more.

Learn more about the code development process by downloading the infographics below.

(Click to download a  ´Ç°ùÌýpdf)

(Click to download a  ´Ç°ùÌýpdf)

É«É«ÊÓƵ Code Development Progress by the numbers. 1,341 code changes. 2,261 voters. 367,345 votes cast

(Click to download a ´Ç°ùÌýpdf)

É«É«ÊÓƵ voting & privileges guide. By membership category. Full voting. No voting. Member benefits.

(Click to download a ´Ç°ùÌýpdf)

The following principles are adhered to in the Code Council's governmental consensus process.

Openness

  • Participation in the development of the codes, including code hearings, is open to all at no cost.
  • Anyone can submit a code change proposal or make a public comment.
  • Code committees must consider all views before voting.

Transparency

  • Evidence of committee vote, with reason, must be documented.
  • Final decisions are made in an open hearing by public safety officials.

Balance of Interest

  • Committee members represent general interests, user interests, producer interests, or multiple interests. One-third of the committee’s members must be public safety officials.
  • Committee members cannot vote on issues that are a conflict of interest.
  • É«É«ÊÓƵ membership is not a condition of committee membership.

Due Process

  • A code change proponent has the opportunity to rebut opponents and vice versa.
  • Anyone who attends the hearing can testify.
  • Committees are required to consider all views, objections and the cost impact of all code change proposals.

Appeals Process

  • Anyone can appeal an action or inaction of the code committee.
  • É«É«ÊÓƵ renders its decision on the appeal based on whether due process was served.

Consensus

  • Committee members vote to approve the code change, make modifications to it, or vote against it.
  • A simple majority from the committee decides the action of the proposed code change.